Trends

Debates, discussions, news articles, cultural differences stories and everyday life blah blah.

On The Road

Follow me in China, in Central and in South America, in Australia, in South-East Asia or in Europe. Enjoy the pictures and some crazy travel stories!

Immigration

How to immigrate to Canada, how to apply for Canadian citizenship, and how to tackle the challenges newcomers face.

Just Blogging

Blog contests, memes, interviews, photography hunts, random facts… Let’s connect, share some blogging fun and some little snippets of life.

The Saturday Series

The ten post Saturday series: how to immigrate to Canada, how to find a job, interviews with immigrants… and more!

Home » Canadian Life

5 Canadian Debates

Written by on October 7, 2009 – 7:07 pm17 Comments | 31 Read this
Demonstration In Front Of The Parliament (June 09)

Demon­stra­tion In Front Of The Par­lia­ment (June 09)

Gen­er­ally speak­ing, Canada is a fairly quiet coun­try: strikes and social unrest are rare, unlike in France where I grew up. I always thought it was mostly due to the size of the coun­try, the dif­fer­ences between the provinces and the three-level polit­i­cal sys­tem (fed­eral, provin­cial and munic­i­pal). Peo­ple in var­i­ous parts of the coun­try have dif­fer­ent con­cerns and some­times see issues dif­fer­ently. For exam­ple, the lan­guage issue is often debated in Que­bec and East­ern Ontario, while the Prairies may be more con­cerned with First Nations rights, the Mar­itimes with fish­ing reg­u­la­tions etc. This is a stereo­types but I believe it explains why fairly few issues mobi­lize the whole country.

That said, each coun­try has its debates and touchy issues that never seem to be solved and are always brought up in the media. Here are the most famous ones in Canada.

Rela­tion­ship between Que­bec and Canada: the his­tory between fran­coph­o­nes and anglo­phones is a long and com­pli­cated one. It’s also the story of a strug­gle between two cul­tures. In the 1960s and 1970s, dur­ing the decol­o­niza­tion, many coun­tries became inde­pen­dent and some advo­cates of Que­bec inde­pen­dence saw Quebec’s sit­u­a­tion in a sim­i­lar light. The main jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for Quebec’s sov­er­eignty is its unique cul­ture and French-speaking major­ity in con­trast to the rest of Canada, but var­i­ous his­tor­i­cal events also weight in the dis­cus­sion. Two ref­er­en­dums were held in 1980 and 1995 and Que­bec remained a province of Canada. That said, the Parti Québé­cois is still a promi­nent party in Québec and while its cur­rent posi­tion on sov­er­eignty isn’t really clear, some Québécers still advo­cate full inde­pen­dence from Canada.

Hockey and the Stan­ley Cup: Cana­di­ans love hockey and take the sport pretty seri­ously. From the begin­ning of the hockey sea­son in the Fall to the Stan­ley Cup, awarded annu­ally to the National Hockey League play­offs cham­pion in the late Spring, hockey sto­ries are often in the media and are part of the national folk­lore. Who was traded, who really suck this year (you can never go wrong with say­ing the Toronto Maple Leafs, the most hated team in Canada!), who scored the best goals… It never ends. The Stan­ley Cup was even sup­posed to boost the morale of the Cana­dian troops and their NATO allies abroad, and the tro­phy made sev­eral trips in com­bat zones.

French and Eng­lish: Canada is offi­cially bilin­gual but this is no sim­ple mat­ter. In fact, the only offi­cial bilin­gual province is New-Brunswick, while Québec is fran­coph­one and the rest of Canada, mostly anglo­phone with sev­eral pock­ets of French com­mu­ni­ties here and there. Bilin­gual­ism man­dates that the fed­eral gov­ern­ment con­duct its busi­ness and pro­vide gov­ern­ment ser­vices in both lan­guages. Access to goods or ser­vices through­out the coun­try must be in both Eng­lish or French — the joke goes that if you want to learn French, you can start by read­ing all the labels on food prod­ucts. The offi­cial bilin­gual­ism pol­icy often sparks intense debates. For exam­ple, fran­coph­o­nes in British-Colombia can asked to be served in French. How­ever, some would argue that French-speakers there are really a minor­ity and that the unof­fi­cial sec­ond lan­guage in the province would instead be Man­darin or Pun­jabi — so why bother serv­ing two or three fran­coph­o­nes in French, given that they prob­a­bly speak Eng­lish any­way? Some also com­plain that the bilin­gual­ism pol­icy is expen­sive and doom to fail.

The Cana­dian iden­tity: if you want to really piss off a Cana­dian, say you don’t see any dif­fer­ence between Canada and the U.S.A. Indeed, the way of life is def­i­nitely North Amer­i­can and we get our share of Amer­i­can cul­ture, thanks to Hol­ly­wood movies and cable chan­nels. But the debate on Cana­dian iden­tity goes deeper. Indeed, Canada is the coun­try that wel­comes the most immi­grants per capita: over 250,000 new­com­ers a year. Canada does need immi­gra­tion for eco­nomic rea­sons yet some are scared that the coun­try will lose its iden­tity. Trudeau’s offi­cial mul­ti­cul­tural soci­ety is often crit­i­cized and ques­tioned, while some really believe in it.

The debate on abor­tion: Canada is one of a few nations with no legal restric­tions on abor­tion. Reg­u­la­tions and acces­si­bil­ity vary between provinces but a major­ity of Cana­di­ans believe abor­tion should remain legal in some cir­cum­stances. Nonethe­less, var­i­ous polit­i­cal par­ties have pro-life mem­bers and the pro-life move­ment is very much alive. In Ottawa for exam­ple, there are daily small protest marches in front of the Morgentaler’s clinic (named after the doc­tor who launched a judi­cial bat­tle to have abor­tion rec­og­nized as a con­sti­tu­tional right under the Cana­dian Char­ter) down­town Ottawa. Pro-life orga­ni­za­tions such as Birthright adver­tise a lot in buses and var­i­ous pub­lic places.

United States – Canada soft­wood lum­ber dis­pute: this dis­pute is one of the most sig­nif­i­cant and endur­ing trade dis­putes in mod­ern his­tory. It is most famous in British Colum­bia, which is the major Cana­dian exporter of soft­wood lum­ber to the USA. The heart of the dis­pute is the Amer­i­can claim that the Cana­dian lum­ber indus­try is unfairly sub­si­dized by the fed­eral and provin­cial gov­ern­ments. The dis­pute had had numer­ous new devel­op­ments and a sur­pris­ingly quite impor­tant num­ber of peo­ple take the dis­pute very seri­ously… it even has its own FAQ page on the Min­istry of For­eign Affairs and Inter­na­tional Trade! To be hon­est, it took me quite a while to under­stand the issue…!

How about where you live? Any recur­ring debates or issues? I’m curious!

Related arti­cles:

  1. Two Soli­tudes And One Loneliness
  2. A Cana­dian Mind­set (8÷10)
  3. 10 Cana­dian Expressions
  4. 3 Unex­pected Con­se­quences of Immigration
  5. Lucile And Mur­taza: From France and India to Montreal

Tagged with:

17 Comments »

  • Seraphine says:

    if the cana­dian gov­ern­ment wants to sub­si­dize tim­ber, then bless you. that means, build­ing mate­ri­als and wood will be cheaper for us than if we grow our own. i say, more power to canada. thank you for the sub­sidy!
    .-= Seraphine´s last blog ..If Walls Had Ears =-.

  • DianeCA says:

    We have quite strong labour unions in Nor­way, which does make for the occa­sional strike, usu­ally in the sea­son when the wage nego­ti­a­tion is going on… I had to laugh when I read how to piss off a Cana­dian! Okay I won’t make that mis­take, I promise.
    .-= DianeCA´s last blog ..DianeCA Con­grat­u­lates Obama on inspir­ing Peace =-.

  • Zhu says:

    @Seraphine — Yes, Canada is fairly calm com­pared to other coun­tries. This is prob­a­bly why most Cana­dian love watch­ing U.S debates and pol­i­tics :lol:

    @Khengsiong — Oh, trust me, when­ever Que­bec threat­ens to sep­a­rate, the whole coun­try is wor­ry­ing. Expect for a minor­ity say­ing that Québec should sep­a­rate because they are p*&&g off a lot of peo­ple :lol:

    @Agnes — I’m sur­prised you have never visited!

    @Sidney — Nope, not yet. ;-)

    @Tulsa Getle­man — Cana­di­ans are more polite and I do think life is less stress­ful here than it is in most parts of the U.S. It shows on the peo­ple as well.

    @Return to Nor­way — Thank you!

    @Nigel — Inter­est­ing! So India is a bit like France, where peo­ple love to com­plain, to strike and think of over­throw the gov­ern­ment every cou­ple of months. Makes life inter­est­ing I guess!

    @Beth — Ouch. Let’s never talk about hockey, shall we? :lol:

    @Bluefish — I do believe in mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism. I know Que­bec had a few debates about it the last cou­ple of years but I don’t think there are too many prob­lems, really. Sure, a minor­ity of idiot like to stir things up… the rest of the peo­ple just want to enjoy life in Canada and make a living.

    @Maurice — Thank you for point­ing out this debate! To be hon­est, I thought the main debate was more about Canada’s iden­tity, rather than immi­gra­tion. Com­pared to many coun­tries actu­ally and con­sid­er­ing the num­ber of new­com­ers per year in Canada, there is sur­pris­ingly lit­tle debate about that.

    I miss the Tamil demon­stra­tions because I was in France I think, but I heard of it. Same thing with Lebanon a cou­ple of years ago which sparked a debate on Cana­dian citizenship.

    @Seraphine — I’m not an econ­o­mist so I’m not even get­ting into the debate!

    @DianeCA — Are unions strong in Nor­way? Just curious.

  • Tony Kondaks says:

    The arti­cle says:

    That said, the Parti Québé­cois is still a promi­nent party in Québec and while its cur­rent posi­tion on sov­er­eignty isn’t really clear, some Québécers still advo­cate full inde­pen­dence from Canada.”

    The inde­pen­dence move­ment in Que­bec is cur­rently dor­mant. Polls show sup­port at about 30%. But sup­port for inde­pen­dence always comes and goes in waves. When Pierre Trudeau left office, sup­port was at an all-time low, about 22%. Yet a few short years later and a con­sti­tu­tional cri­sis risked split­ting the coun­try apart. The 1995 ref­er­en­dum lost only by a whisker.

    When you con­sider that the cur­rently low 30% sup­port is vir­tu­ally 100% amongst Quebec’s 80% of the pop­u­la­tion that is fran­coph­one, you see that this sup­port math­e­mat­i­cally works out to be about 37% if just fran­coph­o­nes are considered…which is NOT a low fig­ure, espe­cially for a time when sep­a­ra­tion is not con­sid­ered pop­u­lar. If this is the low point for sup­port for sov­er­eignty, boy we’re really in for it once sovereignty’s pop­u­lar­ity is on the upswing because its low point has never been so high.

    The real issue is that Quebec’s noto­ri­ous Bill 101 is now sup­ported by all three major fed­eral par­ties. The idea that it is bet­ter to sac­ri­fice human rights to keep Canada together is con­sid­ered de rigeur and Harper, Ignati­eff, and the NDP clown all sup­port and encour­age the race law known as Bill 101.

    How­ever, you can’t keep a coun­try together by vio­lat­ing basic human rights, which most of Bill 101 does. I say: bet­ter to sac­ri­fice Canada for the higher con­cept of human rights than sac­ri­fice human rights for the less impor­tant con­cept called Canada.

  • Zhu says:

    @Tony Kon­daks — I’m really not sure I’m fol­low­ing you. I wouldn’t say sup­port for inde­pen­dance is 100%, even among fran­coph­one Québe­cers. It’s not that simple.

    Plus, I don’t see how Bill 101 goes against human rights… it is some­how con­tro­ver­sial but human rights?!

1 Pingbacks »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

All comments are welcomed!

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get yours, head to Gravatar.