All About Blogging »

Picture of the Week: Lonely Dog

November 4, 2011 – 8:30 am | 8 Comments

Cana­di­ans like pets, and in res­i­den­tial neigh­bour­hoods it’s com­mon to see peo­ple walk­ing their dogs after an early diner, no mat­ter the weather.
How­ever, unlike French, Cana­di­ans are well-behaved and they pick up after their dogs—streets here are not dot­ted with dog poop.

Read the full story »
Home » Beijing 2008, Trends

I Won't Boycott The Olympic Games

Submitted by on April 23, 2008 – 10:22 pm27 Comments

The Bund, Shanghai

The Bund, Shanghai

I’ve been itch­ing to write about this whole Olympic Games/ boy­cott China/ save Tibet thing for a while now. What was hold­ing me back? Prob­a­bly the fact that my opin­ion is a bit dif­fer­ent. I’m not afraid to voice it but I don’t want to be mis­in­ter­preted. I guess I should start by say­ing I don’t sup­port vio­lence, from any side. That I don’t think China is a model of democ­racy. That I won’t be tak­ing side on whether Tibet should be con­sid­ered as part of China or a free inde­pen­dent state — I don’t think I would be a good judge and frankly, I don’t think any of us is, no offense.

That said, some­thing has been both­er­ing me for a while now. Maybe it’s the one-sided view of the prob­lem. Maybe it’s because I feel we’re witch-hunting. Maybe it’s because I can’t take hypocrisy very well. or maybe I’ve just been brain­washed my the Chi­nese as my friends like to joke.

I’m a for­mer Langues’O stu­dent. I’ve been study­ing Chi­nese for over 12 years now (yeah, I started young… French cur­ricu­lum, you know). I lived in China, I stud­ied, I and worked there. I don’t nec­es­sar­ily know more than you about the coun­try but I can see the other side of the story.

So, what’s the deal with China?

Well, first of all, China is a young Repub­lic. The coun­try was ruled by feu­dal dynas­ties until the 1911 repub­li­can rev­o­lu­tion. And then, China didn’t really have a steady gov­ern­ment until Mao took power in 1949. After Yuan Shikai and the war­lords, after the Guo­min­dang dic­ta­tor­ship, after WW2 and the Japan­ese inva­sion, the Com­mu­nist took power quite eas­ily. They had a strong new ide­ol­ogy and they had resisted against Japan — that’s what peo­ple mostly wanted at the time.

Sec­ond of all, there is one think you should know: China hate to be told what to do. Espe­cially by West­ern­ers. Hey, we all have a weak­ness, don’t we?

Remem­ber what I was say­ing above? The last dynasty, the Qing, fell in 1911. Well, at the time, China was pretty weak and def­i­nitely not “mod­ern” by West­ern stan­dards, Diplo­macy and trade, for exam­ple. China was the “中国”, rul­ing over Asia, cen­ter of its world. The Qing did accept for­eign trade, but on a lim­ited basis (spe­cific har­bors, Chi­nese mid­dle­men…). And mean­while, the rest of the world was enter­ing the indus­trial rev­o­lu­tion. And then… clash.

Chi­nese tea, silk and porce­lain were in high demand in the West, yet China wanted lit­tle that the West had to offer, caus­ing the West­ern­ers to incur an unfa­vor­able bal­ance of trade. A rem­edy was found: Eng­land got into opium trade. Imported from India, it was used to buy Chi­nese goods, then for­warded to Europe. Chi­nese opium con­sump­tion soon became a social issue, but the trade ben­e­fits Eng­land, which just had attempted to estab­lish, one more time, an embassy and got turned down. Eng­land even­tu­ally picked a casus belli and started the Opium Wars. The Qing Dynasty, already in inter­nal tur­moil, couldn’t resist. In 1842, the Nan­jing Treaty was signed: China had to cede Hong Kong to the British, open har­bors to for­eign trade, limit duty, grant British national extrater­ri­to­ri­al­ity etc. Britain was to have most-favored-nation treat­ment: it would receive what­ever trad­ing con­ces­sions the Chi­nese granted other pow­ers. They later obtained the con­struc­tion of rail­ways, zones of the eco­nomic and polit­i­cal influ­ences in their leased ter­ri­to­ries. The Treaty of Nan­jing set the scope and char­ac­ter of an unequal rela­tion­ship for the cen­tury of “national humil­i­a­tions”. The treaty was fol­lowed by other incur­sions, wars, and treaties that granted new con­ces­sions and added new priv­i­leges for the foreigners.

This short war sym­bol­ized the bru­tal inte­gra­tion of China in a new world order, invented and dom­i­nated by the USA. The con­tin­ual ref­er­ence to the Unequal Treaties marked Chi­nese his­tory: it is only by recov­er­ing Hong Kong that Deng Xiaop­ing “washed the honor of China”.

Even after WW2, when the new Chi­nese Com­mu­nist Party and the Guo­min­dang fought for power, the USA tried to influ­ence the out­come, in the hope of avoid­ing another “red coun­try”. Basi­cally, it’s only when Mao took power in 1949 that West­ern­ers left China for good… well. almost for good. Remem­ber… Hong Kong and Macao were only returned to China in 1997 and 1999!

So you can imag­ine why China doesn’t like to be told what to do. To the West­ern world, espe­cially to North Amer­ica, the “new con­ti­nent”, a cen­tury is a long time. To the Chi­nese, it’s yes­ter­day. Appar­ently, when Kissinger once asked Zou Enlai if he believed whether the 1789 French Rev­o­lu­tion ben­e­fited human­ity, he replied, “It’s too early to tell.

So, for me, it all comes down to one thing: who are we to judge China?

First thing, pretty much all coun­tries around the world have active seces­sion­ist and auton­o­mist move­ments: La Réu­nion, Brit­tany, Cor­sica (France), Québec and West­ern provinces (Canada), West Papua (Indone­sia), Brus­sels and Flem­ish region (Bel­gium), Azores (Por­tu­gal)… just to name a few ran­domly. So no prob­lem, go demon­strate for a free Tibet but you may open a Pan­dora box — how would you feel if Chi­nese were demon­strat­ing for the inde­pen­dence of Que­bec or Alaska?

We are out­raged against Chi­nese impe­ri­al­ism: yet, a hun­dred years ago, we had no prob­lem invad­ing China. Some may argue that the cur­rent war against ter­ror­ism is just another face of impe­ri­al­ism. France and many coun­tries are still influ­enc­ing their for­mer colonies… and so on.

China and human rights? Not the best match, agreed. Nonethe­less, China is mak­ing progress. And let’s look at our­selves, once again. How long did it take us to abol­ish slav­ery? To stop killing peo­ple because they had darker skin or just looked dif­fer­ent? To allow women to vote?

Now, can we just stop being so blind and look around us? Are we that good and that vir­tu­ous that we can blame other coun­tries? And why China, sud­denly? Is it the worse coun­try we know? Do we usu­ally boy­cott what we think are dic­ta­tor­ship? Because I clearly remem­ber us hav­ing a pretty good rela­tion­ship with Saudi Ara­bia (hello, human rights, any­one?), Libya, for­mer Zaire… just to name a few. Let’s just stop being hyp­ocrite.

I won’t boy­cott the Olympic Games. I love China and I love its peo­ple. I keep on hop­ing the coun­try find its own way to be, between West­ern influ­ence and the weight of its his­tory. I hope human rights keep on mak­ing progress, because there were progress. And I hope I was able to show you another side of the story.

You’re wel­come to argue with me!

Related posts:

  1. The Lord Of The Visa
  2. Eight Ran­dom Facts About Me
  3. Tianan­men Square (天安门广场)
  4. The United Nations At Home
  5. The World For Dummies

Tags: , ,

27 Comments »

  • CM-Chap says:

    Zhu… Sorry for late com­ments here. But here are my views…

    First of all… I’m not a sup­porter for boy­cott and also I hv sym­pa­thy towards my Chi­nese friends. Well I will tell u why sympathy.…

    Its all against Chi­nese Gov­ern­ment. Dont u thnk they r act­ing so arro­gant? So finally to bend them the only way seems to be Olympics.

    On the other hand, Tibet was a sep­a­rate coun­try… (Cour­tesy: Ancient His­tory). Its another story whtr Tibet shd be inde­pen­dent again. But using vio­lence against monks is not accept­able. Thats wat I feel the arro­gancy of the Chi­nese govt play a big role. They sim­ply refuse to talk to Tibet­ian leader in exile.

    As u knw, I’m from India. The land which is always known for “Against Vio­lence”. I have had inter­ac­tions with Tibet ppl as well as Chi­nese. I sim­ply feel both have a log­i­cal point. But it has to dis­cussed. But unfor­tu­nately Chi­nese gvt belives it can be sup­pressed. That’s somethg I dnt thnk will hap­pen & shd happen.

    CM-Chaps last blog post..IPL & IGL

  • Celine says:

    I do not have the req­ui­site knowl­edge of the polit­i­cal devel­op­ments in the region to opine on, but I can say so much with cer­tainty, if I have a chance to travel, I shall not lose that opportunity.

    Have a lovely trip, and enjoy your trav­els, you cit­i­zen of the world. I shall be leav­ing on hol­i­days for a trip up to the Himalayas once again pretty soon.:)

    Celines last great read…Splog­gers

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.